Gap Analysis vs. Feasibility Study: What’s the Difference, What They Actually Tell You (and Why You Need Both)?
A gap analysis and a feasibility study solve two different problems, even when they are tied to the same "business problem". A gap analysis begins with a summary of your current state, your desired future state, and the specific gaps between the two. It provides clarity on the movement and changes needed. A feasibility study can begin with the gap analysis, analyzing what it takes to make the changes successfully. A feasibility study asks the following questions:
- How realistic is it to close that gap, and at what cost?
- What resources are needed?
- What tools will you need to engage?
We use both gap analyses and feasibility reviews when developing a client's technology roadmap. Each provides a different perspective and delivers the greatest value when used together, complementing one another rather than being viewed as substitutes.
60 Seconds on Gap Analysis vs. Feasibility Studies
A gap analysis and a feasibility study answer two different questions, in a specific order. The gap analysis names what's missing between your current and future state; the feasibility study evaluates how realistic it is to close that gap, including the resources and tools it takes.
In other words, the gap analysis identifies where change is needed, while the feasibility study evaluates what it will take to make that change successful. Used together, they feed directly into a technology roadmap.
Featured: Holly Clark at Business Consulting Leader.
What Do Gap Analysis and Feasibility Studies Tell You?
They answer two different questions, in a specific order.
What's actually missing
A gap analysis establishes a clear understanding of where the organization is today and where it wants to go.
- Defines the current state: how processes, systems, and technology operate today
- Defines the future state: what the organization is working toward and what success should look like
- Names the specific gap between the two
- Answers: "What's missing between where we are and where we want to be?"
How realistic closing it is
A feasibility study builds upon the identified gap and evaluates what it will realistically take to close it.
- Looks at the named gap: uses the desired outcome as the basis for evaluating potential solutions
- Evaluates required resources: considers the people, expertise, budget, effort, and time needed
- Identifies technology requirements: determines which existing or new systems, tools, integrations, or capabilities are needed
- Considers practical constraints: evaluates dependencies, risks, timing, and other factors that could influence the approach
- Answers: "What will it realistically take to get there?"
Our Process
Six steps, from goals to a purchase-ready plan.
When You Need These Tools
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
Know What's Missing. Know What It Takes to Fix It.
We'll help you name the gap and pressure-test how realistic it is to close, before you spend a dollar on the wrong solution.

